Vagobond

Books and Writing that Matter. Travel fiction, philosophy, memoir, and experimental work from the road.

Troia: Bonnie Bremser’s Brutal Beat Mexican Memoirs

The Beat Century — post 15 of 100. Bonnie Bremser, Troia: Mexican Memoirs (1969).

Written as prison letters to the husband who directed her into sex work and then edited and titled the book, Bremser’s 1969 memoir is the rawest document the Beat era produced and the least willing to be redeemed.

In 1961 Ray Bremser, a Beat poet with a conviction for armed robbery, violated parole and fled to Mexico. Brenda Frazer — who had left Sweet Briar College to marry him after knowing him three weeks, and who published as Bonnie Bremser — followed with their infant daughter Rachel. They had no money and little Spanish. At her husband’s urging, she supported the family and their drug habit by selling sex.

Troia: Mexican Memoirs is the record of those months. It is the most disturbing book to come out of the Beat milieu, and the discomfort is not incidental to its literary interest — it is the literary interest. Almost everything unbearable about the book is a structural feature rather than a lapse. The discomfort it produces is not incidental to its literary interest but identical with it, since nearly everything unbearable in the book is a structural feature rather than a lapse.

Composed in a Jail’s Mail Room

The book’s form is an artifact of incarceration. After Ray Bremser was jailed in 1963, Frazer sent him weekly two-page letters chronicling the Mexican journey and her experience of sex work. The couple circumvented the prison’s one-page limit on personal correspondence by telling the authorities the letters were business correspondence — a detail that reads, in retrospect, as an unusually exact description of what they contained.

This origin explains the prose. The sentences run long and associative, doubling back, addressed always to one specific reader who already knows the people involved. There is no exposition for a general audience because no general audience was imagined. The result is a first-person voice with the pressure of confession and none of the shaping a memoirist would normally apply. There is no exposition for a general reader because no general reader was imagined, and the prose carries the pressure of confession without any of the shaping a memoirist writing for publication would ordinarily apply. The sentences run long and associative, doubling back constantly, addressed always to one reader who already knew everybody involved. The result is a voice with the pressure of confession and none of the mediation publication normally imposes.

The Editing and the Title

What happened to the letters afterward is inseparable from what the book is. Ray Bremser handed them to the poet Michael Perkins, who edited them for the 1969 Croton Press publication without Frazer’s oversight. It was Ray who supplied the contemptuous title — troia, Italian slang for sow or whore, punning on Helen of Troy — and Ray who pushed for publication. The UK edition appeared under the still more revealing title For Love of Ray.

So the sequence runs: a man directs his wife into prostitution, receives her account of it as letters while imprisoned, hands those letters to another man to edit without her involvement, names the book with a slur for what he made her, and publishes it. The book has been fairly described as carrying both the mystique of Beat legend and a pedigree of appropriation and exploitation. Any reading that treats Troia purely as liberated female Beat expression has to ignore its entire chain of custody.

The Double Suppression

Scholarship on the book has focused on what it exposes about women’s position in the movement. Pressured into the role of family breadwinner, Frazer worked as a prostitute while attempting to meet the obligations of mother and wife. The memoir documents a double suppression: by square society at large, and by the lovers and husbands who left Beat women earning the money and minding the children while the men pursued visionary freedom.

The hardest passages involve Rachel. The daughter is given away during the Mexican period, and Frazer’s account of it is neither self-justifying nor self-flagellating, which makes it worse to read than either would be. The book’s refusal to resolve into either victim narrative or defiant emancipation is precisely why it resists the uses people want to put it to. Any reading that treats the book purely as liberated female Beat expression has to ignore its entire chain of custody, from the direction into sex work through to the slur printed on the cover.

Kerouac’s Road, Inverted

The comparison critics reach for is to Kerouac’s autobiographical road narratives, and the comparison is exact enough to be damning. Both books move across a continent at speed, both are written in long associative sentences, both treat Mexico as the place where American constraint dissolves. The difference is that Kerouac’s narrator chooses the road and Frazer’s is fleeing a parole violation with an infant and no money.

Where Kerouac finds transcendence in poverty, Troia reports the exchange rate. The visionary Mexico of Beat mythology is the same country in which Frazer was negotiating prices with strangers to keep a family fed. Read alongside On the Road, the book functions as a rebuttal delivered in the identical idiom, which is the most difficult kind to dismiss. The comparison to Kerouac is exact enough to be damning, since both writers move across a continent at speed in long associative sentences, and only one of them chose to go.

Rediscovery

Troia fell out of print and out of the conversation for decades before its 2007 republication, which rekindled scholarly interest and produced a critical reassessment. Critics have called it a lost classic of experimental writing and a rendering of Beat aesthetics from a woman’s perspective, and the comparison most often reached for is to Kerouac’s autobiographical road narratives — with the difference that Frazer’s road is not chosen and her ecstasies are purchased with her body.

Frazer outlived the persona, returning to academic work and to writing under her own name. The book she did not fully control remains her monument, which is an uncomfortable outcome for a memoir about being used. Read it for the prose, which is genuinely extraordinary at its best, and read it with the transaction that produced it kept in full view. Read alongside On the Road, the book operates as a rebuttal delivered in the identical idiom, which is the variety hardest to wave away as mere complaint.

The couple told jail authorities that the letters were business correspondence to get around a one-page personal letter maximum.

On the composition of Troia: Mexican Memoirs

Where to go next

Joyce Johnson’s Minor Characters covers the same structural problem from the opposite end of the class ladder — a woman’s Beat life recorded with full authorial control.


Previous: Neal Cassady, The First Third. Next: Charles Olson, The Maximus Poems. One hundred books from the Beat Generation and the writers around them — the ones who got famous, the ones who got written out, and the ecological writing that grew out of the same soil. A new one every other day.

Sources

CD Damitio writes INDIGNIFIED — utopias and dystopias explored. Free to read.

Read on Substack →  |  Full catalog →